“Unlawful restraint” is a charge that can sound worse than the facts behind it.
In Texas, the law uses broad language—“restrain” and “without consent”—and prosecutors often file this charge after heated arguments, custody disputes, or fast-moving situations where the full context isn’t clear.
How the situation is framed matters.
At the Law Offices of Richard C. McConathy, we defend clients across Dallas–Fort Worth facing unlawful restraint and related charges, and we know where these cases are often overcharged. Allegations like this can overlap with those handled by a Dallas Violent Crime Lawyer, where the difference between charges can significantly impact the outcome.
This guide explains how Texas defines unlawful restraint, the penalties involved, the defenses built into the statute, and how it compares to more serious charges like kidnapping.
What Is Unlawful Restraint Under Texas Law?
Unlawful restraint is defined in Texas Penal Code § 20.02. A person commits the offense if they intentionally or knowingly restrain another person. To understand the charge, the key word is “restrain.” Penal Code § 20.01 defines restrain as restricting a person’s movements without consent in a way that substantially interferes with the person’s liberty by:- Moving the person from one place to another, or
- Confining the person
How Unlawful Restraint Is Classified
Penalties depend on who was restrained and the circumstances of the offense:- Class A misdemeanor (default): Up to 1 year in jail and a fine up to $4,000.
- State jail felony: When the person restrained is a child younger than 17. Punishable by 180 days to 2 years in state jail and a fine up to $10,000.
- Third-degree felony: When the actor recklessly exposes the restrained person to a substantial risk of serious bodily injury, restrains a public servant in the lawful discharge of an official duty, or commits the offense while in custody. Punishable by 2 to 10 years in prison and a fine up to $10,000.
Common Situations That Lead to Charges
Many unlawful restraint cases come from situations that started in a private setting:- Domestic disputes: Blocking a partner from leaving a room, taking phone or keys, or physically holding a person during an argument.
- Custody conflicts: Refusing to let a parent or grandparent leave with a child, or moving a child without permission.
- Workplace incidents: Holding a person in an office or back room beyond what reasonable detention allows.
- Retail loss prevention: Detentions that exceed the “shopkeeper’s privilege” authorized by Texas law.
- Friend or roommate disputes: Locking someone in a vehicle or apartment after a heated argument.
Unlawful Restraint vs. Kidnapping vs. Aggravated Kidnapping
Texas treats these offenses as a graduated series, and prosecutors often file multiple counts to give themselves negotiating leverage.- Unlawful Restraint (§ 20.02): Restricting another person’s movement without consent. The least severe of the three.
- Kidnapping (§ 20.03): Intentionally or knowingly abducting another person. “Abduct” means to restrain a person with intent to prevent liberation by either secreting or holding the person where they are not likely to be found, or using or threatening to use deadly force. Generally a third-degree felony.
- Aggravated Kidnapping (§ 20.04): Kidnapping with one of several aggravating factors, including using or threatening deadly force, holding the person for ransom or as a hostage, or intending to inflict bodily injury or sexual abuse. Generally a first-degree felony.
Affirmative Defenses Built Into the Statute
Penal Code § 20.02 includes several affirmative defenses that a defendant may raise:- The person restrained was a child younger than 14, the actor was a relative, and the actor’s sole intent was to assume lawful control of the child.
- The actor was a peace officer or special investigator performing a lawful duty.
- The actor was acting under a judicial order authorizing the restraint.
Common Defense Strategies
Beyond the statutory affirmative defenses, several defense themes appear regularly:- Consent: The other person agreed to the conduct, or the apparent restraint was understood as voluntary.
- No substantial interference with liberty: Brief contact during an argument may not rise to the statutory definition of restraint.
- No intent or knowledge: Mistakes about the alleged victim’s age, identity, or willingness can negate required mental state.
- Mistaken or biased witnesses: False accusations during divorce, custody, or business disputes are common.
- Constitutional challenges: Statements obtained without Miranda warnings, unlawful searches, or improper identification procedures may be excluded.
What to Do If You Are Accused
If you have been accused or arrested for unlawful restraint:- Do not contact the alleged victim. Even neutral messages can be used as evidence and may violate a protective order.
- Preserve text messages, voicemails, and video. Delete nothing.
- Identify witnesses early. Memories fade quickly.
- Decline to give a recorded statement before consulting an attorney.
- Speak with our attorneys to coordinate the criminal case with any related family or civil case.